That it 1999 laws had a couple of major goals: cutting prostitution (for the short term by policing they and also in this new a lot of time term because of the switching social thinking on the they) and you will reducing human trafficking for sexual intentions (Holmstrom Skilbrei, 2017)
A second categorization scheme distinguishes among criminalization, legalization (or regulation), and decriminalization. The first category can be divided into “criminalization of the client” and “criminalization of the seller” (Ostergen, 2017). A third typology, with four categories, comes from Garotalo Geymonat (2014): criminalization (or prohibition), regulation (or legalization), abolitionism, and decriminalization. With criminalization, a state completely outlaws the exchange of sex for money. Criminalization may apply to workers or to clients, as in Sweden. With controls, the state recognizes prostitution/sex work (only among adults and without any restrictions) and regulates the sexual activities. With abolitionism, prostitution/sex work is not illegal per se, but certain activities are declared illegal and banned, such as trafficking and third- party gain (as in brothels and pimping). Decriminalization, the newest category, has been occurring only since 2003, when New Zealand became the first country to adopt this policy. In New Zealand there is no specific law on sex Bodrum prostitute number work, and selling sex and sexual services is equal to any other economic activity. Danna (2014) has suggested two additional categories: neo-prohibi- tionism (the criminalization of the client) and neo-regulationism (non-punitive toward sellers).
The Swedish Sex Purchase Act was first presented as part of the Womens Peace Bill. Its purpose was “to combat prostitution, which was seen as harmful, both for those directly involved and for society at large” (Holmstrom Skilbrei, 2017, p. 83). To accomplish these goals, the law criminalized the clients ot prostitutes (as we know, the law does not use the term sex pros). These clients, who commit a criminal offence, are punished with a fine and in theory even with prison (in 2011, the prison sentence increased from 6 months to 12 months), but only 200 cases are reported each year, and of these only 10% end in a fine or imprisonment (Garofalo Geymonat, 2014). Nonetheless, many other countries, including Norway, Iceland, France, and Ireland, have adopted the “Swedish model.”
Centered on Jonsson and you can Jakobsson (2017), discover a higher rate out-of social welcome for professionals- titution/sex work with countries in which prostitution/sex efforts are courtroom and/otherwise controlled than in regions in which it’s unlawful otherwise criminalized
Twenty years after, we are able to query: Performed the fresh Swedish Sex Get Act get to their desires? Considering Holmstrom and you can Skilbrei (2017), it’s very hard to influence the results, or no, of your Swedish law from inside the Sweden. Earliest, let’s see the fresh law’s very first mission: the latest reduced total of prostitution. According to Kotsadam and you can Jakobsson (2014), prostitution is more popular in which it’s judge (as with Denmark) and less common in which it is unlawful (like in Sweden). But not, “visibility” always makes reference to roadway prostitution. Because 1999, how many feminine (and you will dudes) whom promote sex in the pub for the Sweden possess decreased rather, but it’s almost impossible to say an identical from the on the web prostitution. The newest law’s 2nd goal would be to transform society’s views for the prostitution.
Thus, we can stop you to “brand new Sex Buy Act have triggered increased help in the [Swedish] society for forbidding not merely to order sex and in addition selling sexual services” (Svedin, Jonsson, Kjellgren, Priebe, Akerman, 2012, p. 33). Put simply, it seems that the Swedish inhabitants not merely firmly favors their laws plus thinks the legislation should also criminalize the brand new sellers. However, that it belief performs contrary to the head purposes of guidelines, and therefore is designed to protect the newest victims (the new manufacturers) and also to criminalize clients (Holmstrom Skilbrei, 2017).